🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least twelve months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative commented: “The corporation runs its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, they said, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.