🔗 Share this article

Initially, Trump gave the impression to embrace a firm position concerning Ukraine. After issuing warnings of "severe consequences" last August in case Russia's president carried on blocking truce discussions, Trump finally introduced considerable penalties on the Russian biggest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil. This move significantly impacted the Russian leader's ability to fund his war effort in the region.

But, via his recently unveiled 28-point peace proposal for Ukraine, which was created by both nations' representatives without Ukrainian or EU input, he has seemingly returned to his Russia-friendly position.

Favoring Military Action

The former president's plan would essentially reward Putin for invading Ukraine while putting Ukraine's political freedom in danger. Although bold statements that "The nation's sovereignty will be upheld", significant aspects of the proposal actually compromise that very autonomy. What represents a Russian ideal would likely be a disaster for Ukraine.

Reflecting his real-estate past, the former president seems to treat the situation in Ukraine as a simple border issue, implying ceding Russia a part of Ukrainian land will satisfy the leader. However, Russia's invasion is not only about controlling a destroyed area of economically weakened territory in eastern Ukraine. Rather, it is about the nation's democracy – and the Russian leader's apparent desire to weaken it so it ceases to serves as an appealing example for the Russia's population of the accountable leadership that Putin's growing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Land Giveaways

While keeping in place the currently divided Ukrainian provinces of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the initiative would require Ukraine to give up all of this eastern territory. Aside from rewarding Russia with territory that its forces have been unable to occupy in exceeding a ten years of conflict, this concession would make Ukrainian defensive positions severely undermined.

This region is the site of the nation's well-known "defensive line", the fortified protective structures that constitute a essential barrier to enemy progress. The proposal would have the Ukrainian military leave these fortifications, providing Putin a open way to the capital in case he subsequently opt to resume the conflict.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Additionally, in a step that would make additional fighting simpler for Russia, Trump would force Ukraine to cut the size of its military from their current large number personnel to a maximum of six hundred thousand. Significantly, Trump's proposal places no such limits on Russia's military.

Apparently as a accommodation to Russia's attempts to depict Ukraine's democratically elected government as Nazis, the proposal states: "All radical belief system and practices must be condemned and prohibited." Seemingly to emphasize this aspect, it insists that "The nation will hold elections in three months" of a peace deal. At the same time, Trump sets no requirement that the Russian leader jeopardize his authoritarian rule by allowing elections in Russia.

Defense Assurances

To be sure, the proposal has Russia commit not to "enter bordering nations" and to "incorporate in regulation its policy of non-violence towards Europe and Ukraine". Yet given that the Russian leadership has violated equivalent accords in the history – including the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government committed to honor the nation's borders in return for giving up its Soviet-era nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Russia promised to a truce and a return of occupied land in the Donbas to Ukrainian control – how should we have confidence in Russia now?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on international defense commitments. Although the proposal promises a "decisive joint armed reaction" should Russia resume its invasion, and states that "The nation will receive reliable defense commitments", the details vary from unclear to troubling. The plan would not only prevent Ukraine Nato membership but also prohibit alliance nations from stationing troops on Ukrainian territory, thus preventing the security presence, reportedly commanded by the UK and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been counting to deter Putin from replenishing his reduced military, restocking, and resuming aggression.

Global Reaction

A separate side agreement according to sources would grant the nation with a similar to NATO security guarantee, in which any later "significant, deliberate, and continuous aggression" by Russia on the country "would be considered as an assault jeopardizing the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." This implies a military response. However in contrast to a powerful Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's most reliable protection against renewed hostilities – the credibility of the parallel accord would rely on the commitment of Nato leaders, including Trump, to react with force to Putin's attacks, a response they have {not