🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and revealed recent overtures had come from go-betweens to resume discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in some form if discussions resume.

The American leader recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Position

In his speech to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the European states that had always attempted to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the primary resolution to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the aftermath of this assault."