🔗 Share this article

For months, intimidating communications continued. Initially, supposedly from a former police officer and an ex-military commander, subsequently from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, one resident claims he was ordered to the local precinct and told clearly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

Shaikh is among those opposing a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where one of India's largest slums – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be razed and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of this area is unparalleled in the world," states the protester. "Yet their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and silence our voices."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that overshadow the settlement. Dwellings are assembled randomly and typically without proper sanitation, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the air is saturated with the unpleasant stench of open sewers.

Among some individuals, the vision of the slum's redevelopment into a developed area of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and residences with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future achieved.

"We lack proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for children to play," says A Selvin Nadar, 56, who relocated from his home state in 1982. "The single option is to tear it all down and build us new homes."

Resident Opposition

However, some, like Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

Everyone acknowledges that the slum, historically ignored as informal housing, is urgently needing investment and development. Yet they fear that this project – without community input – could potentially transform premium city property into a luxury development, evicting the lower-caste, working-class residents who have been there since the late 1800s.

It was these shunned, displaced people who established the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of community resilience and commercial output, whose production is valued at between a significant amount and $2m a year, making it a major informal economies.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately a million residents living in the crowded sprawling area, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Others will be transferred to undeveloped zones and saline fields on the distant periphery of Mumbai, threatening to divide a historic social network. A portion will receive no homes at all.

Residents permitted to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated flats in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the evolved, collective approach of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for generations.

Industries from tailoring to clay work and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be relocated to a designated "commercial zone" separated from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

For residents like Shaikh, a workshop owner and third generation of his family to call home Dharavi, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, multi-level workshop makes leather coats – tailored coats, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – marketed in premium stores in south Mumbai and internationally.

His family dwells in the rooms underneath and his workers and sewers – laborers from different regions – also sleep there, enabling him to manage costs. Beyond this community, Mumbai rents are frequently significantly as high for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

In the administrative buildings nearby, a visual representation of the transformation initiative illustrates a very different perspective. Fashionable people gather on two-wheelers and electric vehicles, acquiring continental baguettes and pastries and socializing on a patio outside a coffee shop and dessert parlor. It is a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains local residents.

"This isn't improvement for residents," states the protester. "It represents an enormous property transaction that will render it impossible for our community to continue."

Furthermore, there's concern of the corporate group. Run by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a close ally of the national leader – the corporation has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it rejects.

Even as the state government describes it as a partnership, the business group paid a significant amount for its controlling interest. A lawsuit alleging that the initiative was improperly granted to the corporation is under review in the top court.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to actively protest the development, local opponents state they have been experienced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – including communications, direct threats and implications that opposing the development was equivalent to opposing national interests – by people they allege are associated with the business conglomerate.

Part of the group suspected of making intimidations is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c